Legal Q&A – Varying Intervention Orders

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.
Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

Thank you for your letter, Dylan. As the letter came to us from a prison in Victoria, here is some information from Magistrates’ Court of Victoria that may help you. Please note though, laws in relation to Personal Safety Intervention Orders and Family Violence Intervention Orders (also sometimes called restraining orders, or apprehended violence orders) vary greatly between States. For this reason, it is really important that you seek legal advice from a lawyer in your jurisdiction.
If your situation has changed, you can apply to change a family violence intervention order. The magistrate will assess how it will affect the protected persons and decide.
Changing an order is when you want:
If you are the applicant or affected person, you may want to change the order if you:
To vary, fill in an application to extend, vary or revoke a family violence intervention order form. Print it and bring it to the court where the order was made. You can also do it at the court.
The court registrar will give a date for the court hearing. The application will be served on the other person. If the police took out the order, they will receive the documents too.
At the hearing, you need to show there has been a change in circumstances.
If you are the respondent, you may want to change the order if you:
The court must first grant permission to apply for a change. This is called an application for leave. If you are in custody and need to appear before the Court to make an application to vary an order, you will need to let the Registry know that they need to arrange a custody audio-visual link for you to appear. If there is no link for you, and the application is heard in your absence, there is a real risk that your application to vary will be struck out.
There will be a court hearing where the magistrate will decide if you can apply. You must demonstrate that new facts and circumstances have arisen since the order was made which justify the changes you seek.
If you are allowed to apply, the application will be served on the other person. If the police took out the order, they will receive the documents too.
Thank you for your letter, Dylan. As the letter came to us from a prison in Victoria, here is some information from Magistrates’ Court of Victoria that may help you. Please note though, laws in relation to Personal Safety Intervention Orders and Family Violence Intervention Orders (also sometimes called restraining orders, or apprehended violence orders) vary greatly between States. For this reason, it is really important that you seek legal advice from a lawyer in your jurisdiction.
If your situation has changed, you can apply to change a family violence intervention order. The magistrate will assess how it will affect the protected persons and decide.
Changing an order is when you want:
If you are the applicant or affected person, you may want to change the order if you:
To vary, fill in an application to extend, vary or revoke a family violence intervention order form. Print it and bring it to the court where the order was made. You can also do it at the court.
The court registrar will give a date for the court hearing. The application will be served on the other person. If the police took out the order, they will receive the documents too.
At the hearing, you need to show there has been a change in circumstances.
If you are the respondent, you may want to change the order if you:
The court must first grant permission to apply for a change. This is called an application for leave. If you are in custody and need to appear before the Court to make an application to vary an order, you will need to let the Registry know that they need to arrange a custody audio-visual link for you to appear. If there is no link for you, and the application is heard in your absence, there is a real risk that your application to vary will be struck out.
There will be a court hearing where the magistrate will decide if you can apply. You must demonstrate that new facts and circumstances have arisen since the order was made which justify the changes you seek.
If you are allowed to apply, the application will be served on the other person. If the police took out the order, they will receive the documents too.

If you need help with varying an IVO, you should contact your lawyer, or seek referral to an IVO lawyer through your State’s law bodies, which are:
If you need help with varying an IVO, you should contact your lawyer, or seek referral to an IVO lawyer through your State’s law bodies, which are:
One of the most important aspects of self-advocacy in prison is to understand the rights of prisoners and the limitations of power of prison authorities.
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.
My name is Brian. A lot of guys here are talking about new legislation coming in the near future, but I haven’t found it anywhere. It is called “Daniel’s Law”. I was wondering if you could explain it and when it will take effect and who it will apply to?
Financial counsellors are skilled professionals who provide advice and support to people struggling with bills and debt.
There is a lot of talk about human rights in prison – with things like ‘the Mandela Rules’, ‘the principle of equivalence’, and access to health care without discrimination.
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s.
Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.