Self-Advocacy from Prison: Procedural Fairness
What ‘natural justice’ means, and how prisoners can engage with parole, transfers and breaches
Willy Pleasance
Donate Here
•
Legal Corner
Prisoners are subject to a significant number of decisions during imprisonment, such as decisions on parole, home detention, prison transfers, and alleged conduct breaches. These decisions often require prison authorities to provide procedural fairness to the person subject to a decision.
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s. It assists people to achieve fairness when governments make decisions against them and is said to consist of two main rules: the hearing rule, which is discussed below, and the rule against bias.
The Hearing Rule
The hearing rule consists of three elements designed, essentially, to facilitate engagement in the decision-making process by the person subject to the relevant decision. These parts are:
Prior Notice
The requirement by the decision-maker to tell the person subject to the decision that a decision will be made.
Disclosure
The requirement by the decision-maker to disclose any material they intend on considering in making of the decision, especially material that goes against the outcome sought by the person subject to the decision.
Opportunity to Respond
The requirement to allow a person subject to a decision to make submissions to be considered in the making of the decision, including to provide a response to any material intended to be considered in making
the relevant decision.
These elements may be discharged differently depending on the type of decision being made. For example, the time frame in which prior notice is given about a pending decision may vary from different types of decisions. This time frame may or may not be determined by the legislation under which the relevant decision is made.
It is also important to understand that procedural fairness is not required in all government decisions. The right of procedural fairness can be overridden, but only if the relevant legislation clearly states that procedural fairness is not required. For example, section 501(3) and 501(3A) allows the government to cancel a person’s visa for failing a character test without providing procedural fairness.
What This Means For Prisoners
Participation in decisions is important. It is our opportunity to engage and be heard in decision making processes and to be sure the decision maker has all the relevant information when making decisions.
A failure to provide any of the elements of the hearing rule may render a decision unlawful or invalid. Decisions believed to be made without procedural fairness can often be challenged through an ombudsman, tribunals, or by judicial review in a Supreme Court. Procedural fairness, like all legal doctrines, can be complex in its application.
Any person who feels they have been denied procedural fairness should seek legal advice.
Prisoners are subject to a significant number of decisions during imprisonment, such as decisions on parole, home detention, prison transfers, and alleged conduct breaches. These decisions often require prison authorities to provide procedural fairness to the person subject to a decision.
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s. It assists people to achieve fairness when governments make decisions against them and is said to consist of two main rules: the hearing rule, which is discussed below, and the rule against bias.
The Hearing Rule
The hearing rule consists of three elements designed, essentially, to facilitate engagement in the decision-making process by the person subject to the relevant decision. These parts are:
Prior Notice
The requirement by the decision-maker to tell the person subject to the decision that a decision will be made.
Disclosure
The requirement by the decision-maker to disclose any material they intend on considering in making of the decision, especially material that goes against the outcome sought by the person subject to the decision.
Opportunity to Respond
The requirement to allow a person subject to a decision to make submissions to be considered in the making of the decision, including to provide a response to any material intended to be considered in making
the relevant decision.
These elements may be discharged differently depending on the type of decision being made. For example, the time frame in which prior notice is given about a pending decision may vary from different types of decisions. This time frame may or may not be determined by the legislation under which the relevant decision is made.
It is also important to understand that procedural fairness is not required in all government decisions. The right of procedural fairness can be overridden, but only if the relevant legislation clearly states that procedural fairness is not required. For example, section 501(3) and 501(3A) allows the government to cancel a person’s visa for failing a character test without providing procedural fairness.
What This Means For Prisoners
Participation in decisions is important. It is our opportunity to engage and be heard in decision making processes and to be sure the decision maker has all the relevant information when making decisions.
A failure to provide any of the elements of the hearing rule may render a decision unlawful or invalid. Decisions believed to be made without procedural fairness can often be challenged through an ombudsman, tribunals, or by judicial review in a Supreme Court. Procedural fairness, like all legal doctrines, can be complex in its application.
Any person who feels they have been denied procedural fairness should seek legal advice.
Legal Q&A – Is It Mandatory to Do Courses at Minimum Level Security to Get Parole?
Legal Q&A – Is It Mandatory to Do Courses at Minimum Level Security to Get Parole?
Legal Q&A – Is It Mandatory to Do Courses at Minimum Level Security to Get Parole?
By John
By John
Would I be forced to drop my appeal just to get to minimum security? Is this fair? My parole is due November 12 but I can’t see how I can get it.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 12
•
2 MIN READ
What to Do: Mandatory Visa Cancellation Letters
What to Do: Mandatory Visa Cancellation Letters
What to Do: Mandatory Visa Cancellation Letters
By RACS (Refugee Advice and Casework Service)
By RACS (Refugee Advice and Casework Service)
You got this letter to say that your visa has been cancelled due to your offending. This means you no longer hold a visa.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 15
•
4 MIN READ
Understanding Australia’s Legal System: How Legislation and Common Law Work Together
Understanding Australia’s Legal System: How Legislation and Common Law Work Together
Understanding Australia’s Legal System: How Legislation and Common Law Work Together
By Daniel Vansetten
By Daniel Vansetten
Australia has two sources of law: legislation and common law. Legislation is made by parliaments and is available in documents called acts. Common law is made by judges in court decisions and covers areas that have not been legislated.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 11
•
4 MIN READ
How to Complain to the Ombudsman
How to Complain to the Ombudsman
How to Complain to the Ombudsman
By About Time
By About Time
The Ombudsman is an independent organisation that oversees complaints against government decisions and actions. Each state/territory has their own Ombudsman. The Ombudsman responds to a complaint by investigating from both sides what has happened and why.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 2
•
8 MIN READ
Open Air in Prison: Your Rights Explained
By Human Rights Law Centre and Prisoners’ Legal Service
With people in prisons across the country being subjected to an “epidemic of prison lockdowns”, it is important to note that bare minimum safeguards exist in law, in most jurisdictions, that purport to guarantee at least some time ‘in the open air’ each day for people behind bars.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 22
•
5 MIN READ
Law and Healthcare: Why Can’t I Get My Usual Prescriptions From Prison?
By Prisoners' Legal Service Queensland
There is a lot of talk about human rights in prison – with things like ‘the Mandela Rules’, ‘the principle of equivalence’, and access to health care without discrimination.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 21
•
2 MIN READ
What Happens to Your Debts While You’re Inside?
By Prisoner Legal Service Queensland
Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 20
•
2 MIN READ
Confusing Decision Made About You? Maybe FOI Can Help
By Dan Vansetten
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.
Legal Corner