Law and Healthcare: Why Can’t I Get My Usual Prescriptions From Prison?
How the law can change the medications available inside

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.
Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

There is a lot of talk about human rights in prison – with things like “the Mandela Rules”, ‘the principle of equivalence’, and access to health care without discrimination.
But even though these things are spoken about, often the medicine you get on the inside is different from the medicine you get on the outside – even though your diagnosis hasn’t changed.
So, it is reasonable to ask: why is my medicine different just because I am living in a prison?
One reason is the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth).
The Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) is Australia’s system for making prescription medications affordable and accessible. The PBS is the product of a piece of legislation called the Health Insurance Act 1973.
In the community, if a doctor prescribes medication, there is a good chance that the Australian government has subsidised it.
Since its subsidised under the PBS, you pay relatively cheap price for it at the pharmacy.
Take asthma medication, for example.
Asthma is a very common chronic illness, and it is often treated with a salbutamol inhaler (the “puffer”).
On the outside, the PBS limits the costs of puffers. Usually, the price for a puffer is around 20-30 dollars.
Without the PBS, the cost of a puffer would be much higher.
There is a lot of talk about human rights in prison – with things like “the Mandela Rules”, ‘the principle of equivalence’, and access to health care without discrimination.
But even though these things are spoken about, often the medicine you get on the inside is different from the medicine you get on the outside – even though your diagnosis hasn’t changed.
So, it is reasonable to ask: why is my medicine different just because I am living in a prison?
One reason is the Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth).
The Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme (PBS) is Australia’s system for making prescription medications affordable and accessible. The PBS is the product of a piece of legislation called the Health Insurance Act 1973.
In the community, if a doctor prescribes medication, there is a good chance that the Australian government has subsidised it.
Since its subsidised under the PBS, you pay relatively cheap price for it at the pharmacy.
Take asthma medication, for example.
Asthma is a very common chronic illness, and it is often treated with a salbutamol inhaler (the “puffer”).
On the outside, the PBS limits the costs of puffers. Usually, the price for a puffer is around 20-30 dollars.
Without the PBS, the cost of a puffer would be much higher.
In fact, in the USA, where the government does not universally subsidise asthma puffers, the cost of one inhaler can exceed 100 US dollars.
Due to the way the Health Insurance Act 1973 operates, medicines supplied to people in prison are not subsidised by the PBS. This means, medications prescribed to people in prison may be different from those prescribed to people in the community with the same health needs.
If the PBS was available to people in prison, prison health centres would have a better ability to give you the same medication you receive in the community.
If you are concerned about your access to medication, you might consider:
If you are incarcerated in Queensland, Victoria or the Australian Capital Territory, you might consider contacting the Human Rights Commission that operates in your State or Territory:
Health Ombudsman and Human Rights Commissions may require that you try to resolve any concerns you have with the relevant government agency before making a complaint. There may also be timeframes that apply to making a complaint to these agencies. If you wish to make a complaint, you should seek advice from a legal practitioner in the State or Territory where you are incarcerated.
In fact, in the USA, where the government does not universally subsidise asthma puffers, the cost of one inhaler can exceed 100 US dollars.
Due to the way the Health Insurance Act 1973 operates, medicines supplied to people in prison are not subsidised by the PBS. This means, medications prescribed to people in prison may be different from those prescribed to people in the community with the same health needs.
If the PBS was available to people in prison, prison health centres would have a better ability to give you the same medication you receive in the community.
If you are concerned about your access to medication, you might consider:
If you are incarcerated in Queensland, Victoria or the Australian Capital Territory, you might consider contacting the Human Rights Commission that operates in your State or Territory:
Health Ombudsman and Human Rights Commissions may require that you try to resolve any concerns you have with the relevant government agency before making a complaint. There may also be timeframes that apply to making a complaint to these agencies. If you wish to make a complaint, you should seek advice from a legal practitioner in the State or Territory where you are incarcerated.
With people in prisons across the country being subjected to an “epidemic of prison lockdowns”, it is important to note that bare minimum safeguards exist in law, in most jurisdictions, that purport to guarantee at least some time ‘in the open air’ each day for people behind bars.
This article discusses some of the human rights that may be relevant in prison with reference to human rights protections under the Human Rights Act 2019 (QLD) in Queensland.
If you believe your right to a fair trial has not been provided, you should seek advice from a lawyer.
Financial counsellors are skilled professionals who provide advice and support to people struggling with bills and debt.
With people in prisons across the country being subjected to an “epidemic of prison lockdowns”, it is important to note that bare minimum safeguards exist in law, in most jurisdictions, that purport to guarantee at least some time ‘in the open air’ each day for people behind bars.
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s.
Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.