Legal Q&A – No Body, No Parole
Ethan Cassidy
Donate Here
•
Legal Corner
Hi there, thank you for your question. This information comes from the NSW State Parole Authority:
Under the No Body, No Parole legislation, the NSW Commissioner of Police must provide the NSW State Parole Authority a written report evaluating an offender’s level of co-operation and assistance in identifying the victim’s body or remains.
The legislation applies retrospectively, i.e. for any parole decision made after October 2022, regardless of when the homicide offence or conviction occurred.
How does this legislation impact parole decisions for offenders convicted of homicide?
Community safety is the Parole Authority’s highest priority when making decisions about releasing inmates on parole.
The Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 states the State Parole Authority must not make a parole order if it is not satisfied that it is in the interest of community safety.
Hi there, thank you for your question. This information comes from the NSW State Parole Authority:
Under the No Body, No Parole legislation, the NSW Commissioner of Police must provide the NSW State Parole Authority a written report evaluating an offender’s level of co-operation and assistance in identifying the victim’s body or remains.
The legislation applies retrospectively, i.e. for any parole decision made after October 2022, regardless of when the homicide offence or conviction occurred.
How does this legislation impact parole decisions for offenders convicted of homicide?
Community safety is the Parole Authority’s highest priority when making decisions about releasing inmates on parole.
The Crimes (Administration of Sentences) Act 1999 states the State Parole Authority must not make a parole order if it is not satisfied that it is in the interest of community safety.
•
Legal Q&A
Do you have a general legal query that you want answered?
Is there an area of law that you think people inside should know more about? Submit your question in the provided form, and we might publish an answer in the paper.
Submit Your Question
Following the “no body no parole” amendment, the State Parole Authority is required to have regard to the written advice of NSW Police about the offender’s level of cooperation and assistance concerning the location of the victim.
This includes an evaluation of the timeliness of the offender’s cooperation; the truthfulness, completeness and reliability of information or evidence provided and the significance and usefulness of the offender’s cooperation.
Therefore, the Parole Authority cannot make a parole order unless it is satisfied that the offender has cooperated satisfactorily in police investigations or other actions to identify the victim’s location.”
Added by About Time:
Similar laws have been introduced in the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.
While intended to provide a sense of closure for the family and friends of victims, critics argue that the legislation has serious repercussions for people who are wrongfully convicted. In late 2024, the Bridge of Hope Innocence Project wrote an open letter to the NSW Attorney General, signed by over 100 people, arguing that the law doesn’t effectively incentivise cooperation but instead traps wrongfully convicted individuals in prison, even if they pose minimal risk to society. One high profile example is Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton, who served three years in prison for the murder of her daughter, Azaria. Chamberlain-Creighton was later pardoned when new evidence was found indicating she was innocent.
Following the “no body no parole” amendment, the State Parole Authority is required to have regard to the written advice of NSW Police about the offender’s level of cooperation and assistance concerning the location of the victim.
This includes an evaluation of the timeliness of the offender’s cooperation; the truthfulness, completeness and reliability of information or evidence provided and the significance and usefulness of the offender’s cooperation.
Therefore, the Parole Authority cannot make a parole order unless it is satisfied that the offender has cooperated satisfactorily in police investigations or other actions to identify the victim’s location.”
Added by About Time:
Similar laws have been introduced in the Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.
While intended to provide a sense of closure for the family and friends of victims, critics argue that the legislation has serious repercussions for people who are wrongfully convicted. In late 2024, the Bridge of Hope Innocence Project wrote an open letter to the NSW Attorney General, signed by over 100 people, arguing that the law doesn’t effectively incentivise cooperation but instead traps wrongfully convicted individuals in prison, even if they pose minimal risk to society. One high profile example is Lindy Chamberlain-Creighton, who served three years in prison for the murder of her daughter, Azaria. Chamberlain-Creighton was later pardoned when new evidence was found indicating she was innocent.
Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?
Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?
Do You Have a Right to Legal Representation?
By Daniel Vansetten
By Daniel Vansetten
If you believe your right to a fair trial has not been provided, you should seek advice from a lawyer.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 7
•
5 MIN READ
Common Human Rights Issues in Prison
Common Human Rights Issues in Prison
Common Human Rights Issues in Prison
By Prisoners’ Legal Service (Queensland)
By Prisoners’ Legal Service (Queensland)
This article discusses some of the human rights that may be relevant in prison with reference to human rights protections under the Human Rights Act 2019 (QLD) in Queensland.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 8
•
6 MIN READ
Self-Advocacy from Prison: Procedural Fairness
Self-Advocacy from Prison: Procedural Fairness
Self-Advocacy from Prison: Procedural Fairness
By Dan Vansetten
By Dan Vansetten
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 21
•
2 MIN READ
Confusing Decision Made About You? Maybe FOI Can Help
Confusing Decision Made About You? Maybe FOI Can Help
Confusing Decision Made About You? Maybe FOI Can Help
By Dan Vansetten
By Dan Vansetten
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 20
•
3 MIN READ
Interstate Prison Transfers 101
By About Time
People in prison can apply to transfer from a prison in one state or territory to another, generally for welfare reasons to be closer to family, community supports, or rehabilitation opportunities.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 24
•
4 MIN READ
Inspectors’ Report!
By About Time
Inspectors and ombudsmen regularly go to prisons and publish reports on what they find and what they think needs to be improved. They also complete reports on issues such as access to healthcare or the use of segregation.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 23
•
4 MIN READ
The Parole Patchwork: An Overview of Australia’s Parole Laws
By Human Rights Law Centre lawyer Monique Hurley, with assistance from Connor Shaw
In recent years, regressive reform of parole laws in many places has made it increasingly difficult for people in prison to access parole.
Legal Corner
ISSUE NO. 23
•
4 MIN READ
Open Air in Prison: Your Rights Explained
By Human Rights Law Centre and Prisoners’ Legal Service
With people in prisons across the country being subjected to an “epidemic of prison lockdowns”, it is important to note that bare minimum safeguards exist in law, in most jurisdictions, that purport to guarantee at least some time ‘in the open air’ each day for people behind bars.
Legal Corner