How to Complain to the Ombudsman
Reporting complaints against government decisions and actions

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.
Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

The Ombudsman is an independent organisation that oversees complaints against government decisions and actions. Each state/territory has their own Ombudsman. The Ombudsman responds to a complaint by investigating from both sides what has happened and why.
People in prison can complain to the Ombudsman about certain decisions of prison authorities. These are administrative decisions, meaning decisions made from certain legal powers that impact your rights. These include (but are not limited to!):
Note: The Ombudsman cannot take complaints on issues that relate to staff shortages or the physical condition of the prison as these are not ‘administrative acts’ (acts done by someone who has certain powers under the law). These types of issues are matters for the Minister for Corrections, who can also be written to.
The Ombudsman will assess your complaint to see if it’s an issue they can assist with. If so, they will also ask the prison for their version of events. They will see if the prison can change their practices and will go on to make further recommendations. However, prison authorities do not have to do what the Ombudsman recommends. Their powers are quite weak.
You might get a letter saying that the complaint is ‘resolved’ or they will ‘close’ the complaint without things changing much. If you’re unhappy with the decision, you can ask for an ‘internal review’, where a senior Ombudsman reviews the decision. But that might not change their decision either.
While the system can be frustrating, it is always good to let the Ombudsman know about an issue so it is on record, even if you think nothing will happen. It can contribute to a number of other complaints around similar issues, and raise ‘systemic’ concerns that the Ombudsman then investigates. Anything from an Ombudsman investigation may also serve as evidence if you take something to court later.
Know that you always have a right to complain and while you may not get the result you wanted, you are standing up for what you believe is right, which no one can take away from you.
Firstly, the Ombudsman will only take on a complaint if you’ve raised it with the prison first. You should make this complaint in writing and most likely to the General Manager. Ask someone to help you with your complaint if you need.
Then you wait. The Ombudsman will usually only help after enough time has passed, usually 30 days. After this time, if you haven’t heard anything from the prison, you should complain. If you received a response from the prison for your complaint and you’re not happy with it, you should complain to the Ombudsman.
However, if you have an urgent issue like you have been told you are being transferred to another prison, or you have been denied access to items you require for medical reasons for example, and you have not been able to resolve these issues with the prison, you should still contact the Ombudsman. They may be able to then contact the prison so that this type of decision can be delayed while a review can be made.
The Ombudsman will not touch anything that is going to court. It is always a good idea to make a complaint to the Ombudsman before taking anything to court. The Ombudsman could help solve a problem easier, while court procedures are long and difficult and potentially expensive. If you still have to go to court, the Ombudsman will then have evidence of your complaint which might help you.
The Ombudsman is an independent organisation that oversees complaints against government decisions and actions. Each state/territory has their own Ombudsman. The Ombudsman responds to a complaint by investigating from both sides what has happened and why.
People in prison can complain to the Ombudsman about certain decisions of prison authorities. These are administrative decisions, meaning decisions made from certain legal powers that impact your rights. These include (but are not limited to!):
Note: The Ombudsman cannot take complaints on issues that relate to staff shortages or the physical condition of the prison as these are not ‘administrative acts’ (acts done by someone who has certain powers under the law). These types of issues are matters for the Minister for Corrections, who can also be written to.
The Ombudsman will assess your complaint to see if it’s an issue they can assist with. If so, they will also ask the prison for their version of events. They will see if the prison can change their practices and will go on to make further recommendations. However, prison authorities do not have to do what the Ombudsman recommends. Their powers are quite weak.
You might get a letter saying that the complaint is ‘resolved’ or they will ‘close’ the complaint without things changing much. If you’re unhappy with the decision, you can ask for an ‘internal review’, where a senior Ombudsman reviews the decision. But that might not change their decision either.
While the system can be frustrating, it is always good to let the Ombudsman know about an issue so it is on record, even if you think nothing will happen. It can contribute to a number of other complaints around similar issues, and raise ‘systemic’ concerns that the Ombudsman then investigates. Anything from an Ombudsman investigation may also serve as evidence if you take something to court later.
Know that you always have a right to complain and while you may not get the result you wanted, you are standing up for what you believe is right, which no one can take away from you.
Firstly, the Ombudsman will only take on a complaint if you’ve raised it with the prison first. You should make this complaint in writing and most likely to the General Manager. Ask someone to help you with your complaint if you need.
Then you wait. The Ombudsman will usually only help after enough time has passed, usually 30 days. After this time, if you haven’t heard anything from the prison, you should complain. If you received a response from the prison for your complaint and you’re not happy with it, you should complain to the Ombudsman.
However, if you have an urgent issue like you have been told you are being transferred to another prison, or you have been denied access to items you require for medical reasons for example, and you have not been able to resolve these issues with the prison, you should still contact the Ombudsman. They may be able to then contact the prison so that this type of decision can be delayed while a review can be made.
The Ombudsman will not touch anything that is going to court. It is always a good idea to make a complaint to the Ombudsman before taking anything to court. The Ombudsman could help solve a problem easier, while court procedures are long and difficult and potentially expensive. If you still have to go to court, the Ombudsman will then have evidence of your complaint which might help you.

You should include the following:
You can write to your relevant Ombudsman. We've listed the addresses here. Prison officers are not allowed to open your letters to the Ombudsman.
Prison phones have free calls to the Ombudsman.
You should include the following:
You can write to your relevant Ombudsman. We've listed the addresses here. Prison officers are not allowed to open your letters to the Ombudsman.
Prison phones have free calls to the Ombudsman.
I was reading a section of ‘Australia’s National Prison Newspaper’ where it gave some information about bail but I couldn’t find any information about people trying to vary intervention orders (I.V.O).
New laws mean that immigration detention officers can now confiscate things like mobile phones, iPads and laptops, which were previously allowed in detention centres. If you’re facing time in immigration detention at the end of your sentence, this article gives some practical tips to prepare for the new rules before you go.
In Queensland, there have been concerns raised about the way DNA evidence is processed and examined in forensic laboratories.
What is the legal sentence period after which an inmate must reapply for the DSP?
There is a lot of talk about human rights in prison – with things like ‘the Mandela Rules’, ‘the principle of equivalence’, and access to health care without discrimination.
Procedural fairness, often called “natural justice”, is a collection of rights, established under common law in Australia around the 1980s.
Generally, debts can be put into two categories. First, there are private debts (e.g. from a bank, a landlord, a car dealer, or ‘Afterpay’). Second, there are debts owed to the State (e.g. unpaid fines).
The concern for those who are subjected to government decisions is that they often do not get to see the integrity of the information which was considered by the decision-maker and don’t get to check if it’s correct.