Australia's National
Prison Newspaper

Australia's National
Prison Newspaper

ISSUE NO. 3

September 2024

ISSUE NO. 3

+

Sections

September 2024

Donate Here

The Case of Ron Brierley, Healthcare and Elderly Prisoners

Issues with healthcare for the elderly in prison

Sam Harris is a retired inmate.

Marcelo Leal

Font Size
Font Size
Line Height
Line Height
Dyslexia Friendly
Black & White
Hide Images
Night Mode

Ron Brierley’s case is the tip of a very large iceberg when it comes to elderly people and healthcare in prison.

In December 2019, then 82-year-old Brierley was detained at Sydney International Airport following an anonymous tip-off.

On 1 April 2021, Brierley pleaded guilty to three counts of possessing child abuse material.

On 14 October 2021, Brierley  was sentenced to 14 months in jail, with a seven-month non-parole period.

Discovering skin cancer

On the day of his imprisonment, Brierley complained of a “sore” on his left leg. More than a week later, Brierley had not yet seen a doctor or received a health assessment. Brierley’s solicitor sent an email to Justice Health. No response was received.

Eleven days later, Brierley was seen by a doctor in jail who showed concern, and he was placed on a five-month waiting list to see a doctor at Prince of Wales hospital.

As Brierley became increasingly anxious, he discovered a new lump at the same site of the sore. Following urgent representation by his solicitor – to which Justice Health also did not reply – Brierley was transported to Long Bay Prison on 16 November 2021, and a biopsy of the lump was carried out on his leg. The biopsy confirmed skin cancer.

Upon returning to his cell, Brierley experienced regular bouts of heavy bleeding from the biopsy site, requiring pressure bandages. Brierley also began to suffer a severe urinary tract infection. It took 10 days for him to be prescribed antibiotics. He went on to suffer recurring urinary infections.

Surgical removal of his skin cancer took place on 8 December 2021.

Although his dermatologist recommended a three-week period of hospitalisation to allow appropriate time to heal, Brierley was immediately transferred back to jail to recover.

In his cell, Brierley’s wound bled frequently and urinary tract infections continued. Bed rest was almost impossible.

Throughout his imprisonment, Brierley developed a fear of falling in the shower, as the facilities had no hand railings or non-slip tiles. He chose to shower just once every 10 days because of his unsteadiness. Brierley had a moderate degree of vascular dementia and heart disease prior to his imprisonment.

On 28 December 2021, the stitches around Brierley’s leg wound broke down, resulting in an uncontrollable haemorrhage and emergency hospital admission. An attempt was made to admit Brierley to the Kevin Waller unit at Long Bay hospital, but the 26-bed ward was already full.

Challenging the sentence

In February 2022, the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal allowed Brierley’s legal team to challenge his sentence. The court was told that Brierley’s health had deteriorated since his imprisonment and the conditions under which he was incarcerated were “onerous”. Brierley was re-sentenced to 10 months jail with a four-month non-parole period. He was released from jail on 13 February 2022.

Justices Beech-Jones, Harrison and Fagan agreed that the sentencing judge, Judge Huggett (as she was then known), made no error in law when she sentenced the former Brierley to jail.

However, the Court found that there was a “striking” discrepancy between the conditions Judge Huggett had been led to believe Brierley would be subject to, and the actual conditions he faced as an 84-year-old inmate in deteriorating health at Long Bay jail.

The Court found that contrary to the assurances Justice Health provided to Judge Huggett on sentence, Brierley was not assessed by any form of healthcare practitioner until 11 days after entering jail, nor had Brierley received an aged care assessment for three weeks, which was an unusually long time to wait. Ultimately, he was never admitted to an aged care facility in jail.

Their Honours found that there had been a “seriously deficient provision of welfare for a prisoner in this class” and that the evidence “supports a conclusion that Corrective Services, in conjunction with Justice Health, is not able to provide conditions of imprisonment to the reasonable standard of safety and humanity that her Honour evidently understood would be provided when the sentence was passed”.

Ron Brierley’s case is the tip of a very large iceberg when it comes to elderly people and healthcare in prison.

In December 2019, then 82-year-old Brierley was detained at Sydney International Airport following an anonymous tip-off.

On 1 April 2021, Brierley pleaded guilty to three counts of possessing child abuse material.

On 14 October 2021, Brierley  was sentenced to 14 months in jail, with a seven-month non-parole period.

Discovering skin cancer

On the day of his imprisonment, Brierley complained of a “sore” on his left leg. More than a week later, Brierley had not yet seen a doctor or received a health assessment. Brierley’s solicitor sent an email to Justice Health. No response was received.

Eleven days later, Brierley was seen by a doctor in jail who showed concern, and he was placed on a five-month waiting list to see a doctor at Prince of Wales hospital.

As Brierley became increasingly anxious, he discovered a new lump at the same site of the sore. Following urgent representation by his solicitor – to which Justice Health also did not reply – Brierley was transported to Long Bay Prison on 16 November 2021, and a biopsy of the lump was carried out on his leg. The biopsy confirmed skin cancer.

Upon returning to his cell, Brierley experienced regular bouts of heavy bleeding from the biopsy site, requiring pressure bandages. Brierley also began to suffer a severe urinary tract infection. It took 10 days for him to be prescribed antibiotics. He went on to suffer recurring urinary infections.

Surgical removal of his skin cancer took place on 8 December 2021.

Although his dermatologist recommended a three-week period of hospitalisation to allow appropriate time to heal, Brierley was immediately transferred back to jail to recover.

In his cell, Brierley’s wound bled frequently and urinary tract infections continued. Bed rest was almost impossible.

Throughout his imprisonment, Brierley developed a fear of falling in the shower, as the facilities had no hand railings or non-slip tiles. He chose to shower just once every 10 days because of his unsteadiness. Brierley had a moderate degree of vascular dementia and heart disease prior to his imprisonment.

On 28 December 2021, the stitches around Brierley’s leg wound broke down, resulting in an uncontrollable haemorrhage and emergency hospital admission. An attempt was made to admit Brierley to the Kevin Waller unit at Long Bay hospital, but the 26-bed ward was already full.

Challenging the sentence

In February 2022, the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal allowed Brierley’s legal team to challenge his sentence. The court was told that Brierley’s health had deteriorated since his imprisonment and the conditions under which he was incarcerated were “onerous”. Brierley was re-sentenced to 10 months jail with a four-month non-parole period. He was released from jail on 13 February 2022.

Justices Beech-Jones, Harrison and Fagan agreed that the sentencing judge, Judge Huggett (as she was then known), made no error in law when she sentenced the former Brierley to jail.

However, the Court found that there was a “striking” discrepancy between the conditions Judge Huggett had been led to believe Brierley would be subject to, and the actual conditions he faced as an 84-year-old inmate in deteriorating health at Long Bay jail.

The Court found that contrary to the assurances Justice Health provided to Judge Huggett on sentence, Brierley was not assessed by any form of healthcare practitioner until 11 days after entering jail, nor had Brierley received an aged care assessment for three weeks, which was an unusually long time to wait. Ultimately, he was never admitted to an aged care facility in jail.

Their Honours found that there had been a “seriously deficient provision of welfare for a prisoner in this class” and that the evidence “supports a conclusion that Corrective Services, in conjunction with Justice Health, is not able to provide conditions of imprisonment to the reasonable standard of safety and humanity that her Honour evidently understood would be provided when the sentence was passed”.

Get the full paper in print each month.

6-Month Subscription:

Physical copy of About Time delivered to your home or organisation each month for six months. Paid upfront.

Subscribe for $70

12-Month Subscription:

Physical copy of About Time delivered to your home or organisation each month for twelve months. Paid upfront.

Subscribe for $125

The author’s view — Ensuring equitable care

Brierley’s case demonstrates how elderly inmates are treated within a system that does not safeguard the healthcare needs of its prisoners.

As older inmates represent an increasing percentage of the total prison population, it is likely that they will continue to receive suboptimal and inappropriate care, unless the “system” undergoes significant quality improvement.

Brierley’s case also showcases why sentencing judges should very carefully consider the relevant medical histories of older offenders, and in particular, the inability of Correctional Services and Justice Health to accurately and promptly assess and offer older inmates appropriate care.

The case serves as a wake-up call for urgent reforms to the prison system, including:

  • Dedicated facilities: Increased investment in specialised facilities for elderly prisoners, equipped with appropriate medical care and support services.
  • Comprehensive healthcare: Improved access to quality healthcare, including mental health services, for all prisoners, with particular attention to the needs of older inmates.
  • Staff training: Training correctional officers and medical staff to understand the specific needs of elderly prisoners.
  • Regular assessments: Mandatory health assessments for all elderly inmates upon entry and at regular intervals.
  • Compassionate release: Consideration of compassionate release for elderly prisoners with terminal illnesses or severe, debilitating conditions.

It is imperative that steps are taken to prevent similar situations as Brierley’s from occurring in the future.

The author’s view — Ensuring equitable care

Brierley’s case demonstrates how elderly inmates are treated within a system that does not safeguard the healthcare needs of its prisoners.

As older inmates represent an increasing percentage of the total prison population, it is likely that they will continue to receive suboptimal and inappropriate care, unless the “system” undergoes significant quality improvement.

Brierley’s case also showcases why sentencing judges should very carefully consider the relevant medical histories of older offenders, and in particular, the inability of Correctional Services and Justice Health to accurately and promptly assess and offer older inmates appropriate care.

The case serves as a wake-up call for urgent reforms to the prison system, including:

  • Dedicated facilities: Increased investment in specialised facilities for elderly prisoners, equipped with appropriate medical care and support services.
  • Comprehensive healthcare: Improved access to quality healthcare, including mental health services, for all prisoners, with particular attention to the needs of older inmates.
  • Staff training: Training correctional officers and medical staff to understand the specific needs of elderly prisoners.
  • Regular assessments: Mandatory health assessments for all elderly inmates upon entry and at regular intervals.
  • Compassionate release: Consideration of compassionate release for elderly prisoners with terminal illnesses or severe, debilitating conditions.

It is imperative that steps are taken to prevent similar situations as Brierley’s from occurring in the future.

Leave a Comment

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
0 Comments
Author Name
Comment Time

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere. uis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Around The Country – March 2025

By About Time

Including tough bail laws being introduced in Victoria, the South Australian Government ruling out raising the age of criminal responsibility, a new parole board president appointed in Queensland and more.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 9

2-3 MIN READ EACH

The Policy Commitments of the Major Parties

By About Time

The Australian Federal election is coming up. This is about voting for the Prime Minister and other federal politicians. It will be held on 3 May 2025.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 9

4 MIN READ

The Ongoing Fight to Vote in Prison

By Denham Sadler

“We can’t get information about how a party or candidate’s policies must impact prisoners,” Kelly told About Time. ‘Prison officers also will not provide us with any information as it is seen as political.”

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 9

6 MIN READ

Recognising the Rights of Incarcerated Workers

By Andreea Lachsz

Prison work differs across the country.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 8

7 MIN READ

Newsletter

Be the first to learn about our monthly stories, plus new initiatives and live events

You've successfully registered!
Something went wrong when we tried to register your details. Please try again.

Support Australia's first national prison newspaper

A place for news and education, expression and hope.

Help us get About Time off the ground. All donations are tax deductible and will be vital in providing an essential resource for people in prison and their loved ones.

It's
About Time.

A place for news and education, expression and hope.

Help us get About Time off the ground. All donations are tax deductible and will be vital in providing an essential resource for people in prison and their loved ones.

Donate Here

Welcome to About Time

About Time is the national newspaper for Australian prisons and detention facilities

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.

Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

Donations via GiveNow

Email

Instagram

LinkedIn

Newsletter

Be the first to learn about our monthly stories, plus new initiatives and live events

You've successfully registered!
Something went wrong when we tried to register your details. Please try again.