Australia's National
Prison Newspaper

Australia's National
Prison Newspaper

ISSUE NO. 18

January 2026

Donate Here

Cover Story

Police Installed Prison Listening Devices Without Proper Warrants

Watchdog finds 115 listening devices were installed in Victorian prisons without proper legal approval, raising concerns about prosecutions and privileged conversations.

Denham Sadler is the Chief Reporter at About Time.

Willy Pleasance

Font Size
Font Size
Line Height
Line Height
Dyslexia Friendly
Black & White
Hide Images
Night Mode

More than 100 listening devices were installed in Victorian prisons in the last 20 years without proper legal approval, according to a new report.

Integrity Oversight Victoria found that at least 115 of these surveillance devices were installed around the state, often at times when construction or renovation was taking place at a prison, between 2000 and 2018.

The watchdog found that these permanent listening devices were not installed under the authorisation of a warrant, and when police were applying to turn one of these devices on as part of investigations, the courts were not told that they were already installed.

“It is our assessment that Victoria Police did not comply with the Surveillance Devices Act when installing and maintaining integrated listening devices,” the report said.

Integrity Oversight Victoria said that while there was no evidence that the listening devices had been turned on illegally in the prisons, there were also no records from the time to confirm they had only been activated under warrants.

“We were unable to definitively verify whether activations of the integrated listening devices were consistent with warrants due to the unavailability of primary records that indicated when these devices were activated,” the report said.

Since becoming aware that the installation of these listening devices may have been illegal, Victoria Police said it immediately terminated use of them, and is working to determine if recordings from the devices were used as part of prosecutions.

Criminal defence lawyer Felix Ralph, a partner at MJR Criminal Lawyers, has regularly visited prisons in Victoria to meet with clients, and said he was concerned to read the report.

“I think it’s outrageous,” Ralph told About Time. “I think that people in prison should be rightly concerned about this as a human rights abuse. I just think it’s extraordinary.

“This is an industrialised and normalised procedure, and I think it was an open secret in prisons.”

The report investigated 99 warrants issued from 2008 to 2024 seeking to install listening devices in prisons in Victoria. It found that Victoria Police did not tell the judge about the permanent listening devices when it applied for these warrants.

Most of the applications were for the “installation and use” of listening devices in prisons, when they were mostly just being turned on or off,
and left sitting within the prison.

The report said that the use of listening devices in prisons is a “significant investigative tool and one that Victoria Police is eager to keep confidential to protect its efficacy”.

Victoria Police is now removing some parts of the devices to make them unusable until new warrants are issued, and looking at retrospective reforms to make their use legal.

Police are also doing “considerable analysis” to identify whether recordings from these devices were used in prosecutions, and will then make “appropriate disclosures”.

More than 100 listening devices were installed in Victorian prisons in the last 20 years without proper legal approval, according to a new report.

Integrity Oversight Victoria found that at least 115 of these surveillance devices were installed around the state, often at times when construction or renovation was taking place at a prison, between 2000 and 2018.

The watchdog found that these permanent listening devices were not installed under the authorisation of a warrant, and when police were applying to turn one of these devices on as part of investigations, the courts were not told that they were already installed.

“It is our assessment that Victoria Police did not comply with the Surveillance Devices Act when installing and maintaining integrated listening devices,” the report said.

Integrity Oversight Victoria said that while there was no evidence that the listening devices had been turned on illegally in the prisons, there were also no records from the time to confirm they had only been activated under warrants.

“We were unable to definitively verify whether activations of the integrated listening devices were consistent with warrants due to the unavailability of primary records that indicated when these devices were activated,” the report said.

Since becoming aware that the installation of these listening devices may have been illegal, Victoria Police said it immediately terminated use of them, and is working to determine if recordings from the devices were used as part of prosecutions.

Criminal defence lawyer Felix Ralph, a partner at MJR Criminal Lawyers, has regularly visited prisons in Victoria to meet with clients, and said he was concerned to read the report.

“I think it’s outrageous,” Ralph told About Time. “I think that people in prison should be rightly concerned about this as a human rights abuse. I just think it’s extraordinary.

“This is an industrialised and normalised procedure, and I think it was an open secret in prisons.”

The report investigated 99 warrants issued from 2008 to 2024 seeking to install listening devices in prisons in Victoria. It found that Victoria Police did not tell the judge about the permanent listening devices when it applied for these warrants.

Most of the applications were for the “installation and use” of listening devices in prisons, when they were mostly just being turned on or off,
and left sitting within the prison.

The report said that the use of listening devices in prisons is a “significant investigative tool and one that Victoria Police is eager to keep confidential to protect its efficacy”.

Victoria Police is now removing some parts of the devices to make them unusable until new warrants are issued, and looking at retrospective reforms to make their use legal.

Police are also doing “considerable analysis” to identify whether recordings from these devices were used in prosecutions, and will then make “appropriate disclosures”.

Get the full paper in print each month.

6-Month Subscription:

Physical copy of About Time delivered to your home or organisation each month for six months. Paid upfront.

Subscribe for $70

12-Month Subscription:

Physical copy of About Time delivered to your home or organisation each month for twelve months. Paid upfront.

Subscribe for $125

In response to the report, Victoria Police said that the listening devices were only ever activated with the permission of a valid warrant.

It acknowledged that “there were implications if information obtained from these devices was relied on in prosecutions”.

Ralph said that more investigation needs to take place into the use of the listening devices.

“In an ideal world there’d be a Royal Commission into this,” he said.

“If you keep pulling at the thread of the sweater it’ll unravel. I want to know whether it was done during legally privileged conversations. There are also really sensitive and legitimate conversations happening in those areas, like sending psychologists or psychiatrists in to discuss with people in prison, really intimate details they would discuss with no-one.”

It’s not the first time that the potentially illegal use of surveillance devices in Australian prisons has been revealed.

It was revealed in 2023 that listening devices had been unlawfully recording conversations in meeting rooms at Risdon Prison, in Tasmania, for 2 months in 2017.

The devices were installed with a warrant to record a conversation between a target and their lawyer but were left on and continued to record more than 700 meetings in the rooms for another 2 months.

These recordings were then transmitted to a police headquarters. The judge for the trial in question ruled that the recordings could not be used in court as the warrant used to obtain them was too broad. A subsequent investigation determined that none of these conversations were monitored or downloaded by police.

The Victorian Ombudsman in 2012 released a report on the death of Carl Williams at Barwon Prison, revealing that 10 listening devices were found in multiple units at the prison, which had been installed without a warrant.

These listening devices were inoperable, the report said.

In response to the report, Victoria Police said that the listening devices were only ever activated with the permission of a valid warrant.

It acknowledged that “there were implications if information obtained from these devices was relied on in prosecutions”.

Ralph said that more investigation needs to take place into the use of the listening devices.

“In an ideal world there’d be a Royal Commission into this,” he said.

“If you keep pulling at the thread of the sweater it’ll unravel. I want to know whether it was done during legally privileged conversations. There are also really sensitive and legitimate conversations happening in those areas, like sending psychologists or psychiatrists in to discuss with people in prison, really intimate details they would discuss with no-one.”

It’s not the first time that the potentially illegal use of surveillance devices in Australian prisons has been revealed.

It was revealed in 2023 that listening devices had been unlawfully recording conversations in meeting rooms at Risdon Prison, in Tasmania, for 2 months in 2017.

The devices were installed with a warrant to record a conversation between a target and their lawyer but were left on and continued to record more than 700 meetings in the rooms for another 2 months.

These recordings were then transmitted to a police headquarters. The judge for the trial in question ruled that the recordings could not be used in court as the warrant used to obtain them was too broad. A subsequent investigation determined that none of these conversations were monitored or downloaded by police.

The Victorian Ombudsman in 2012 released a report on the death of Carl Williams at Barwon Prison, revealing that 10 listening devices were found in multiple units at the prison, which had been installed without a warrant.

These listening devices were inoperable, the report said.

Leave a Comment

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
0 Comments
Author Name
Comment Time

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere. uis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.

Cleveland’s Death Was Preventable, Predictable and Predicted: Coroner

By Denham Sadler

The death of a 16-year-old First Nations teenager in a notorious youth unit of an adult prison in Western Australia was preventable and predictable, and the result of “serious longstanding deficiencies in the system, a Coroner has found.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 18

2 MIN READ

Palliative Care in Prison and the Push for Change

By Sophie Lawson

End-of-life care, also known as palliative care, is a healthcare process that aims to improve the quality of life and reduce the suffering of those who are terminally ill. Being incarcerated can make this stage of life even more complicated.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 18

3 MIN READ

Around the Country – December 2025

By About Time

Including a Victorian man suing for his right to have Vegemite in prison, a new framework for rehabilitation being launched by NT Corrections, a QLD Watchdog calling separation rooms in youth prisons ‘inhumane’ and more.

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 18

8 MIN READ

Impacts of Proposed New Freedom of Information Laws

By Daniel Vansetten

Obtaining information from federal agencies is about to become subject to stricter rules under the Freedom of Information Amendment Bill 2025 (Cth).

News and Investigations

ISSUE NO. 18

2 MIN READ

Newsletter

Be the first to learn about our monthly stories, plus new initiatives and live events

You've successfully registered!
Something went wrong when we tried to register your details. Please try again.

Support Australia's First National Prison Newspaper

A place for news and education, expression and hope

Help keep the momentum going. All donations will be vital in providing an essential resource for people in prison and their loved ones.

All donations of $2 or more are tax deductible. If you would like to pay directly into our bank account to avoid the processing fee, please contact donate@abouttime.org.au. ABN 67 667 331 106.

It's
About Time.

A place for news and education, expression and hope.

Help us get About Time off the ground. All donations are tax deductible and will be vital in providing an essential resource for people in prison and their loved ones.

Donate Here

Welcome to About Time

About Time is the national newspaper for Australian prisons and detention facilities

Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.

Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.

Donations via GiveNow

Email

Instagram

LinkedIn

Newsletter

Be the first to learn about our monthly stories, plus new initiatives and live events

You've successfully registered!
Something went wrong when we tried to register your details. Please try again.