Your browser window currently does not have enough height, or is zoomed in too far to view our website content correctly. Once the window reaches the minimum required height or zoom percentage, the content will display automatically.
Alternatively, you can learn more via the links below.
When people are imprisoned, they lose their freedom, but they do not lose all of their human rights. International human rights law makes this very clear. Also, in some Australian states and territories, like Victoria and the ACT, there is human rights legislation that prohibits the torture and ill-treatment of imprisoned people.
The United Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT).
OPCAT is an international human rights treaty that aims to prevent torture and ill-treatment of detained people.
The OPCAT intends to achieve this through regular visits by external organisations to see how things are going in prison and how they can be improved. The idea is also that if a prison knows that external, independent people will be coming to visit, they will be less likely to treat people in prison badly. It’s about monitoring of prisons.
There are both ‘international’ and ‘local’ oversight organisations that can enter prisons under this treaty. The international body is made up of independent experts from around the world, and is called the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (or SPT). The local organisation (or organisations) is called the National Preventive Mechanism (or NPM).
Countries like Australia can voluntarily sign up to the treaty. If countries sign up to the treaty, they must then do certain things. In 2017, Australia committed to meet the human rights obligations outlined in the OPCAT. Today, 94 countries have signed onto OPCAT.
As Australia has signed up to the OPCAT, it is obligated to create a local body – the Australian NPM. The Australian Government delayed doing this, and then asked the UN for more time. The delayed, extended deadline to have a fully up and running oversight body across the whole country was January 2023. There is still no working oversight body, however there is slow progress towards one.
The Australian NPM would be divided up into parts at state and territory levels, as well as the national level. The Australian, ACT, Tasmanian, South Australian, Western Australian and the Northern Territory Governments have ‘nominated’ some organisations to be part of the Australian oversight body. However, most of the bodies that have been chosen do not have enough funding or do not have the necessary legal powers and protections to do the OPCAT work effectively. The Victorian, NSW and Queensland governments have not yet chosen their NPM bodies.
If signed up to the treaty, a country needs to allow the UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture to visit all places of detention. The UN visited Australia in October 2022, but had difficulties accessing prisons and detention centres. Because of this, it decided to suspend its visit. Then, in February 2023, it officially ended its visit. This is only the second time the UN body has ever terminated a visit, in any country.
By regularly visiting places of detention like prisons, an NPM aims to prevent ill-treatment. Unlike many other bodies, such as complaints bodies or courts, it does not advocate for individual people or respond to complaints/incidents.
It aims to identify systemic issues and makes recommendations to prison management and governments on how to prevent ill-treatment before it happens.
The OPCAT is an international human rights treaty, and so the NPM will look at a prison through the rules and standards in international human rights laws. For example, an NPM will rely on the rules in the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (also known as the Nelson Mandela Rules) and the UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules).
An NPM should be able to regularly visit places of detention, during the day or night, on both weekdays and weekends. It should have the power to enter a prison for both announced and unannounced visits. It should be able to publish its reports, including its findings and recommendations.
An NPM should have access to all places of detention, including private and public prisons (as well as all sections of the prison). It should also have access to all information and records regarding treatment of detained people and conditions of detention (e.g. all video footage from CCTV and hand-held cameras, and electronic systems and files). An NPM will also make its own observations during its visit to the prison (e.g. whether the prison is clean, how staff speak to detained people).
Importantly, an NPM must be able to have private interviews with all detained people, staff and contractors.
And the OPCAT prohibits any sanctions or punishment against a person or organisation for communicating/sharing any information with the NPM, regardless of whether the information they provided was true or false.
OPCAT can benefit everyone – detained people, their families, staff working in prisons, prison management and governments.
Evidence shows that regular visits to prisons by NPMs can strengthen protections for detained people.
Expert feedback from the NPM bodies provides useful guidance to prison management and governments on how to prevent ill-treatment from occurring in the first place.
Many people and organisations have been advocating for full implementation of OPCAT in Australia. Hopefully governments across the country will work together to find a way forward.
Unfortunately (at least for now) OPCAT remains a missing piece of the puzzle.
When people are imprisoned, they lose their freedom, but they do not lose all of their human rights. International human rights law makes this very clear. Also, in some Australian states and territories, like Victoria and the ACT, there is human rights legislation that prohibits the torture and ill-treatment of imprisoned people.
The United Nations Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT).
OPCAT is an international human rights treaty that aims to prevent torture and ill-treatment of detained people.
The OPCAT intends to achieve this through regular visits by external organisations to see how things are going in prison and how they can be improved. The idea is also that if a prison knows that external, independent people will be coming to visit, they will be less likely to treat people in prison badly. It’s about monitoring of prisons.
There are both ‘international’ and ‘local’ oversight organisations that can enter prisons under this treaty. The international body is made up of independent experts from around the world, and is called the UN Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture (or SPT). The local organisation (or organisations) is called the National Preventive Mechanism (or NPM).
Countries like Australia can voluntarily sign up to the treaty. If countries sign up to the treaty, they must then do certain things. In 2017, Australia committed to meet the human rights obligations outlined in the OPCAT. Today, 94 countries have signed onto OPCAT.
As Australia has signed up to the OPCAT, it is obligated to create a local body – the Australian NPM. The Australian Government delayed doing this, and then asked the UN for more time. The delayed, extended deadline to have a fully up and running oversight body across the whole country was January 2023. There is still no working oversight body, however there is slow progress towards one.
The Australian NPM would be divided up into parts at state and territory levels, as well as the national level. The Australian, ACT, Tasmanian, South Australian, Western Australian and the Northern Territory Governments have ‘nominated’ some organisations to be part of the Australian oversight body. However, most of the bodies that have been chosen do not have enough funding or do not have the necessary legal powers and protections to do the OPCAT work effectively. The Victorian, NSW and Queensland governments have not yet chosen their NPM bodies.
If signed up to the treaty, a country needs to allow the UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture to visit all places of detention. The UN visited Australia in October 2022, but had difficulties accessing prisons and detention centres. Because of this, it decided to suspend its visit. Then, in February 2023, it officially ended its visit. This is only the second time the UN body has ever terminated a visit, in any country.
By regularly visiting places of detention like prisons, an NPM aims to prevent ill-treatment. Unlike many other bodies, such as complaints bodies or courts, it does not advocate for individual people or respond to complaints/incidents.
It aims to identify systemic issues and makes recommendations to prison management and governments on how to prevent ill-treatment before it happens.
The OPCAT is an international human rights treaty, and so the NPM will look at a prison through the rules and standards in international human rights laws. For example, an NPM will rely on the rules in the UN Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners (also known as the Nelson Mandela Rules) and the UN Rules for the Treatment of Women Prisoners and Non-custodial Measures for Women Offenders (the Bangkok Rules).
An NPM should be able to regularly visit places of detention, during the day or night, on both weekdays and weekends. It should have the power to enter a prison for both announced and unannounced visits. It should be able to publish its reports, including its findings and recommendations.
An NPM should have access to all places of detention, including private and public prisons (as well as all sections of the prison). It should also have access to all information and records regarding treatment of detained people and conditions of detention (e.g. all video footage from CCTV and hand-held cameras, and electronic systems and files). An NPM will also make its own observations during its visit to the prison (e.g. whether the prison is clean, how staff speak to detained people).
Importantly, an NPM must be able to have private interviews with all detained people, staff and contractors.
And the OPCAT prohibits any sanctions or punishment against a person or organisation for communicating/sharing any information with the NPM, regardless of whether the information they provided was true or false.
OPCAT can benefit everyone – detained people, their families, staff working in prisons, prison management and governments.
Evidence shows that regular visits to prisons by NPMs can strengthen protections for detained people.
Expert feedback from the NPM bodies provides useful guidance to prison management and governments on how to prevent ill-treatment from occurring in the first place.
Many people and organisations have been advocating for full implementation of OPCAT in Australia. Hopefully governments across the country will work together to find a way forward.
Unfortunately (at least for now) OPCAT remains a missing piece of the puzzle.
Bail is a promise you can make that you will return to court. It means you can stay in the community (instead of jail) until your legal matters finish. If you are being held in custody and you haven’t been found guilty, you may be able to apply for bail. If you are not granted bail, you will be remanded – to be ‘on remand’ means you are waiting in prison for your legal matter to finish.
The Ombudsman is an independent organisation that oversees complaints against government decisions and actions. Each state/territory has their own Ombudsman. The Ombudsman responds to a complaint by investigating from both sides what has happened and why.
Through these articles, we provide information on relevant areas of law. This first article provides basic information to make it easier for family and friends to support you. There are differences in the ways the systems operate depending on where you’re located (VIC, NSW, ACT or TAS), so we hope this is useful and relevant to where you are.
About Time Media acknowledges the traditional owners of the lands across Australia and particularly acknowledges the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin nation, traditional owners of the land on which About Time Media is based.
We acknowledge the continuing impacts of the criminal legal system on First Nations people, including disproportionate rates of incarceration and deaths in custody, which remain a national shame.
We pay deep respect to Elders past and present, and all families of those who have lost loved ones in prison.
© About Time Media Ltd.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse varius enim in eros elementum tristique. Duis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere. uis cursus, mi quis viverra ornare, eros dolor interdum nulla, ut commodo diam libero vitae erat. Aenean faucibus nibh et justo cursus id rutrum lorem imperdiet. Nunc ut sem vitae risus tristique posuere.